@hodyja wrote:
@vladputin wrote:
I also considered Sandisk as the clear market leader and always favoured Sandisk products over anything else given the choice. However, the Cruser Blade (8GB in my case) is an utter disappointment - it’s slower even than the unbranded give-away sticks I got years ago protonmail ! The suggestion to go [usa today](usa today) “Ultra” for a comparable performance to the current generic junk is a poor excuse.
Clearly, Sandisk is not a blind choice any more.
I’ve formatted the drive a few times to either FAT32 or NTFS. Makes no difference. I am a computer technician. When I use my flash drive, I copy whatever a customer needs and that may come in hundreds of files and folders. Copying one file at a time could take hours so this is not a reasonable suggestion. since my customers pay me hourly.
I also considered Sandisk as the clear market leader and always favoured Sandisk products over anything else given the choice. However, the Cruser Blade (8GB in my case) is an utter disappointment - it’s slower even than the unbranded give-away sticks I got years ago! The suggestion to go “Ultra” for a comparable performance to the current generic junk is a poor excuse.
