FLAC format not supported

Files created by foobar. Bitrate 916kbps, sample rate 44100Hz, Bits per sample 16, encoding lossless. I was informed in shop that this format will be suported. Firmware 1.22

1 Like

FLAC: supported 1000 Kbps - 1200 Kbps:

Are you sure? Is there any specification for flac files, any links?

http://kb.sandisk.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14130

http://downloads.sandisk.com/downloads/um/clipsport-um.pdf

1 Like

I cannot find this information in this manual, but  Ive looked for google and really I’ve found this information in:

http://kb.sandisk.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/14130/~/sandisk-clip-sport%2Fjam-supported-file-types

It is a pity that this information is not available on the carton of this MP3 player and in the shop.

1 Like

FLAC files copy to the memory of the main device and play them.
FLAC MicroSD me to play only if the MicroSD Class 4 (Kingston 32GB Class 4)

Flac = «lossy»? :dizzy_face: (see above Chart)

Flac files on my SanDisk class 10 card do play, but show interferences. I haven’t tried to play them from the internal memory, not knowing it will make a difference – which I hardly can comprehend, though.

However, who needs Flac on the Sansas! MP3 will do.

I need flac because I have most of my music files in FLAC format.  BTW In what cases need to have a FLAC is useful? :smiley: FLAC is generally better format than MP3 regardless of the quality of the device, isn’t it? In my opinion bitrate between 1000kbps and 1200kbps is total bull**bleep** because most of audio material has bitrate less than 1000kbps. I don’t know how to create FLAC with more than 1000kbps. Someone knows?

@antekgruczol wrote:

I need flac because I have most of my music files in FLAC format.  BTW In what cases need to have a FLAC is useful? :smiley: FLAC is generally better format than MP3 regardless of the quality of the device, isn’t it? In my opinion bitrate between 1000kbps and 1200kbps is total bull**bleep** because most of audio material has bitrate less than 1000kbps. I don’t know how to create FLAC with more than 1000kbps. Someone knows?

Generally better? Depends on the ears. I have a hard time hearing a difference between Lame -V0 or even -V2 and lossless. But even if you hear one, is it decisive? I mean, you listen through a SanDisk Sport, and I dare to pretend a FiiO X5 or X3 II with MP3s (of course well encoded) will sound clearly better than a Sport full of Flacs. What I mean to say: The Sport – as good as it sounds – is not the device which you’d use for exploring the highest recording qualities. So MP3 will make more sense.

BTW, I use mostly Flac with my FiiOs – also because the X5 is the center of my home system (as a digital drive feeding a high-end DAC/headphone amp).

I’ve never encountered bitrates higher than 990 kbps with Flac files (~700 kbps or below being the norm).

SanDisk Clip Sport is MP3player for for fools or poor/miser people

For comparison
Specification not much more expensive COWON E3 8GB
Playback Time
Music : Max. 11 Hours 30 Minutes
Battery Charging
USB : 1 Hour 30 Minutes (5V / 500mA)
Frequency Range
20Hz ~ 20KHz
Max Output
Stereo, Left: 12mW, Right :12mW (16? earphones)
S/N Ratio
95dB
File Formats
MP3/2, WMA, OGG, FLAC, WAV

JaZZ agree with you. But it is unprofessional to write in specs FLAC support if playing this format is impossible or dificult.

@antekgruczol wrote:

SanDisk Clip Sport is MP3player for for fools or poor/miser people

For comparison
Specification not much more expensive COWON E3 8GB …

Not a player for my needs (can’t use a touchscreen during jogging). How does it sound?

I’m glad for you that you don’t belong to the fool people like us! :smiley:

@antekgruczol wrote:

JaZZ agree with you. But it is unprofessional to write in specs FLAC support if playing this format is impossible or dificult.

That’s where I agree with you! :stuck_out_tongue: Maybe they are ashamed to mention it.

Jazz wrote:  I’m glad for you that you don’t belong to the fool people like us!

:smiley: I just gave yourself be fooled by the non-professional seller.

Well, I never cared for Flac on the Sport (tried it just out of curiosity), and I was aware of the split database (another unwanted feature) beforehand, so I knew what to expect from the player, which still satisfies my needs in its dedicated area (sports).