I recently purchased a 64GB class 10 UHS-1 micro SDXC card which I plan to use in my Samsung Galaxy S3. When I tried to benchmark it in my PC’s reader, I was surprised to find out that I was only getting about 9MB/sec read speed instead of the 28MB/sec some people were getting using crystaldiskmark…! I was later told that the host device needs to be UHS-1 compatible in order to get the full speeds…still, I wonder, how could it test so slow if I can test a standard 8GB SDHC card at 22MB/sec read in the same reader?! How does that make sense?? I asked Samsung directly and the S3 is not even UHS-1 enabled…Does this mean that everybody buying this card (64GB micro SDXC class 10 UHS-1) for their phones are wasting money?! Because if the S3 is not UHS-1 compatible, I doubt any other phone is…
Would buying the same card but class 6 give better speeds in non-UHS-1 host devices?!
The card will work it will just work at a slower speed. The UHS cards will not however work at 30MB/s their Max speed will be more around 20MB/s in non UHS devices. UHS and non UHS product have different hardware and firmware. While they are backwards compatible they are not the same and the performance will differ slightly.
the 2 class 10 UHS-1 cards are the same. the class 6 card was designed using SD 2.0 spec where the UHS class 10 cards were designed using the SD 3.0 spec.
Some Android devices are having problems accessing Class 10 cards. I use the 64GB Mobile Ultra Class 6 card in my ASUS Infinity Tablet and it performs fine.
I’m looking for fast and good value cards for my camera (Panasonic mirrorless GX7), so it can be standard SD size but It’s nice to have the option to use the card in smartphone as well especially when it gets older.
Will the microSD brothers match quality of SDSDU?
Is there any difference between both MicroSD offerings or it’s only marketing positioning difference?
many thanks for the answer, and the Happy New Year!