Clearly, the new ones are cheaper to manufacture. But they are inferior in every way imaginable.
Why does a company give up on a runaway success to peddle an abysmal failure, instead? Better they had raised the price than lower the quality.
Clearly, the new ones are cheaper to manufacture. But they are inferior in every way imaginable.
Why does a company give up on a runaway success to peddle an abysmal failure, instead? Better they had raised the price than lower the quality.