Lady Gaga Doesn't Like Ice Cream!

First, it was the meat dress she wore to the awards show last year. Then this year, she arrives in Mork’s egg being carried by a bunch of egg-bearers.

Now she’s suing a small business owner in London for using the ‘Gaga’ name in one of his products.

Maybe I should also post this in the thread What is the strangest flavor of ice cream you tasted?

:stuck_out_tongue:

@tapeworm wrote:

First, it was the meat dress she wore to the awards show last year. Then this year, she arrives in Mork’s egg being carried by a bunch of egg-bearers.

 

Now she’s suing a small business owner in London for using the ‘Gaga’ name in one of his products.

 

Maybe I should also post this in the thread What is the strangest flavor of ice cream you tasted?

 

:stuck_out_tongue:

Lady Gaga has every right to sue.   Her name is like a trademark and the way the word “Gaga” is spelled is exactly like her name.  If it wasn’t meant to make people think of her, then the maker of the ice cream could have spelled it " Ga Ga".

Two questions about this ice cream:

   1. Does a person need to be burped after he/she eats it?

    2. Who are the people that provide the main ingredient?

For me, she has all the right to sue.  She owns that trademark and by using it, it seems you use it with the benefit of attracting customers for free.  So the company needs to pay. 

Babies have been saying “Ga-ga” for hundreds of years before this Madonna-wannabe decided to use it for her stage name. She has no claim to it.

The fact that she wants to make this an issue further reinforces the fact that she is one of the most (if not THE most) vulgar entertainers (and I use that term extremely loosely since she’s anything but) out there at this time and is doing it simply for the publicity.

@tapeworm wrote:

Babies have been saying “Ga-ga” for hundreds of years before this Madonna-wannabe decided to use it for her stage name. She has no claim to it.

 

The fact that she wants to make this an issue further reinforces the fact that she is one of the most (if not THE most) vulgar entertainers (and I use that term extremely loosely since she’s anything but) out there at this time and is doing it simply for the publicity.

 

Worked for the Kardashian girls, didn’t it? :stuck_out_tongue:

@marvin_martian wrote:

 

Worked for the Kardashian girls, didn’t it? :stuck_out_tongue:

Who?

@tapeworm wrote:


@marvin_martian wrote:

 

Worked for the Kardashian girls, didn’t it? :stuck_out_tongue:


Who?

 

 

Come on now…if you know who Lady Gaga is, you know who they are. Frankly, I don’t ever want to see them again, but I can’tr seem to escape them :dizzy_face:

@tapeworm wrote:


@marvin_martian wrote:

 

Worked for the Kardashian girls, didn’t it? :stuck_out_tongue:


Who?

 

 

I bet you know who Bruce Jenner is.  He’s also their stepfather.

Here he is in his glory days after having won the olympic gold medal.

@tapeworm wrote:

 

The fact that she wants to make this an issue further reinforces the fact that she is one of the most (if not THE most) vulgar entertainers (and I use that term extremely loosely since she’s anything but) out there at this time and is doing it simply for the publicity.

 

Well, she’s getting the attention again for that meat dress.  She is a very creative artist and there’s nothing wrong with knowing how to get the media’s attention. 

Lady Gaga’s meat dress in Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

What’s next for her?  A statue in Madame Tussands Wax Museum?

All I can say is OMG! :womansurprised: I’m starting to love Sandisk! 

@doughlas789 wrote:

All I can say is OMG! :womansurprised: I’m starting to love Sandisk! 

And I’m starting to hate new members with nothing to say!

:angry: