Whats the difference between the 2 versions anyway?
@nintendogamer92 wrote:
Whats the difference between the 2 versions anyway?
Minor Hardware… nothing in terms of playback or functionality.
@conversionbox wrote:
@nintendogamer92 wrote:
Whats the difference between the 2 versions anyway?
Minor Hardware… nothing in terms of playback or functionality.
Actually, with theClip, and therefore probably also the Fuze, it’s a change in the SoC from AS3525 to AS3531 (for which AMS has not made a data sheet publically available).
See under Models here:
@gwk1967 wrote:
<snip>
Which boils down to exactly what CB said: “Minor Hardware… nothing in terms of playback or functionality.”
In other words, the guts have changed, but it works exactly the same from the user perspective.
Message Edited by gwk1967 on 06-02-2009 06:08 PM
It’s easy to trot out the generic answer - and in most threads on this forum, it’s the right answer.
But in the context of this thread, which is about Rockbox, and specifically in the context of a discussion about the availability of Rockbox on v2 Fuze, the “Minor Hardware” change is of major importance.
Why? Because for a Rockbox port it is the guts of the player that is the important aspect.
The fact that AMS have not released the data sheet for the device used in the v2 Fuze may well be a show stopper so far as porting Rockbox to Sansa v2 AMS devices. At the very least it will seriously delay such a port.
