Thanks for the google keywords. I’ve spent a good bit of time looking thru both google and MS and hadn’t found the ‘lossless’ reference. That method (lossless) comes with too big an overhead price (space) for me.
Who shoots digital pictures in .tiff format? Audiophiles, maybe. 
That a player expecting to be much of anything but worthless would NOT support gapless playback amazes me. My question came from the standpoint of, ‘SURELY this is a common situation, WHY does it seem so inscrutable!’
‘Lossless’ answers the WMA encoding part, ‘No way’ answers the playback (Fuze) part.
Thank you for time.
Message Edited by canyncarvr on 01-24-2010 10:29 AM
